If emptiness incarnates as existence could that mean that there’s no “the world”?
No world in the sense of something causing what’s happening to happen.
A something having an independent substance meaning there’s something substantial to these thingumabob artifacts.
So they’d stick around even when not being experienced.
Leaving behind the jettisoned world of dearly departed.
What if “the world” as the behind the scenes given took a powder?
Because if what is experienced is coming directly from emptiness.
The peg upon which reality hangs might drop its drawers.
Exposing reality to be no more substantial than watching a movie.
So that all going on there is what’s cooking here.
Like it all started with a blank whatever.
Something unformed empty new.
To make something unsubstantial assumed to be created substantial.
Since it got captured shaped moved edited performed it must have existed.
In another state.
In the past.
If the world was actually once there when was it?
Is it possible to experience the past as having once been there?
Not if the past is always recalled in the present moment.
If so, “the world” as having an independent existence may have just taken a hit.
May have unless things really got blown to smithereens or shot to death during the shoot.
Except that’s not what’s going on viewed and seen in the art as imaged.
Patrons catch their breath. On cue.
Taken-in by the suspension of disbelief.
If so, the credence given to reality must be different.
Where things do get blown to bits and real lives are lost.
Because to assume otherwise could implode the metaphysical house of cards needed to feel safe and secure.
To ask when any art ever left the present moment might nuke the wall between past, present and future.
Even worse suggest the phenomenon world might have the same metaphysical status as art.
Existence as metaphysically aesthetic?
If so, to prevent a reality meltdown.
Past events might need be assuredly assumed to have happened.
In a past that’s never been actually experienced outside of now.
If the problem doing metaphysics is no way to prove what’s being proposed is false.
Mass agreement might be needed to believe it so.
Because who needs something to be true in order to make it appear true.
Why couldn’t the world as experienced be fundamentally art?
If art happens to happen in and of.
An art world.
Reality re-imaged.
Theater, dance, performing and fine art.
Effervescent bubbling volcanic blood brew.
Corroding hermetically sealed walls between art and reality.
Aesthetics the metaphysical sense of reality.
Where universal is particular.
Concrete abstraction.
If because.
Art happens everywhere all the time.
Presuming God the Supreme Artist.
Asking if there’s can be another spatially present moment.
As world art comakers?
Artist is audience as selfsame world.
If so, could an aesthetic sense blanket sweet dreams?
As if reality is indeed art.
Jailbreak where art only thought possible.
